CCBC-Net Archives
[CCBC-Net] Old Is New Again
- Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
From: Deborah Kogan Ray <dkray>
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 21:12:29 -0500
This has been my mantra for so long, it has finally gotten me out of passive on-line list reading. I totally agree with Chudacoff about both the history and the recent changes. I think most of what is happening begins with the climate of fear that pervades our society and makes parents so terrified that they feel they must provide activity for every waking hour -- whether it be the latest toy, electronic device, or myriad of organized sports and after school lessons. I don't blame them. The world is a dangerous place (though if I examine my long ago childhood, it was filled with many of the same dangers). But I cringe at the structured lives that children live now, rushing from one adult controlled activity to the next. And I have no wonder at children's anger -- both aggressively and passively expressed. I am shocked when I see a eight year old with a cellphone and always accessible to the grown up world. It sends chills up my spine. God knows I spent my childhood attempting to escape adult scrutiny! No wonder the only avenue for escape is text messaging that so befuddles parents. As to childhood play
-- who remembers the joy of a discarded appliance carton? It became a house, a fort, a secret clubhouse. Childhood should be subversive and have its secrets -- be a place where imagination can flourish.
James Elliott wrote:
> NPR had an article on the new 'Play' for children today. And I wonder how that relates to the 'retro' books coming on the market -- perhaps a nostalgic move towards a simpler time when play wasn't determined by how many controllers you had for your XBox 360?
>
> http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=19212514
>
> Part of the article reads:
>
> Chudacoff's recently published history of child's play argues that for most of human history what children did when they played was roam in packs large or small, more or less unsupervised, and engage in freewheeling imaginative play. They were pirates and princesses, aristocrats and action heroes. Basically, says Chudacoff, they spent most of their time doing what looked like nothing much at all.
>
> "They improvised play, whether it was in the outdoors? or whether it was on a street corner or somebody's back yard," Chudacoff says. "They improvised their own play; they regulated their play; they made up their own rules."
>
> But during the second half of the 20th century, Chudacoff argues, play changed radically. Instead of spending their time in autonomous shifting make-believe, children were supplied with ever more specific toys for play and predetermined scripts. Essentially, instead of playing pirate with a tree branch they played Star Wars with a toy light saber. Chudacoff calls this the commercialization and co-optation of child's play ? a trend which begins to shrink the size of children's imaginative space.
>
> But commercialization isn't the only reason imagination comes under siege. In the second half of the 20th century, Chudacoff says, parents became increasingly concerned about safety, and were driven to create play environments that were secure and could not be penetrated by threats of the outside world. Karate classes, gymnastics, summer camps ? these create safe environments for children, Chudacoff says. And they also do something more: for middle-class parents increasingly worried about achievement, they offer to enrich a child's mind.
> ______
>
> Despite the evidence of the benefits of imaginative play, however, even in the context of preschool young children's play is in decline. According to Yale psychological researcher Dorothy Singer, teachers and school administrators just don't see the value.
>
> "Because of the testing, and the emphasis now that you have to really pass these tests, teachers are starting earlier and earlier to drill the kids in their basic fundamentals. Play is viewed as unnecessary, a waste of time," Singer says. "I have so many articles that have documented the shortening of free play for children, where the teachers in these schools are using the time for cognitive skills."
>
> and concludes:
>
> It seems that in the rush to give children every advantage ? to protect them, to stimulate them, to enrich them ? our culture has unwittingly compromised one of the activities that helped children most. All that wasted time was not such a waste after all.
> _______________________________________________
> CCBC-Net mailing list
> CCBC-Net at ccbc.education.wisc.edu
> Visit this link to read archives or to unsubscribe...
> http://ccbc.education.wisc.edu/mailman/listinfo/ccbc-net
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 21:12:29 -0500
This has been my mantra for so long, it has finally gotten me out of passive on-line list reading. I totally agree with Chudacoff about both the history and the recent changes. I think most of what is happening begins with the climate of fear that pervades our society and makes parents so terrified that they feel they must provide activity for every waking hour -- whether it be the latest toy, electronic device, or myriad of organized sports and after school lessons. I don't blame them. The world is a dangerous place (though if I examine my long ago childhood, it was filled with many of the same dangers). But I cringe at the structured lives that children live now, rushing from one adult controlled activity to the next. And I have no wonder at children's anger -- both aggressively and passively expressed. I am shocked when I see a eight year old with a cellphone and always accessible to the grown up world. It sends chills up my spine. God knows I spent my childhood attempting to escape adult scrutiny! No wonder the only avenue for escape is text messaging that so befuddles parents. As to childhood play
-- who remembers the joy of a discarded appliance carton? It became a house, a fort, a secret clubhouse. Childhood should be subversive and have its secrets -- be a place where imagination can flourish.
James Elliott wrote:
> NPR had an article on the new 'Play' for children today. And I wonder how that relates to the 'retro' books coming on the market -- perhaps a nostalgic move towards a simpler time when play wasn't determined by how many controllers you had for your XBox 360?
>
> http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=19212514
>
> Part of the article reads:
>
> Chudacoff's recently published history of child's play argues that for most of human history what children did when they played was roam in packs large or small, more or less unsupervised, and engage in freewheeling imaginative play. They were pirates and princesses, aristocrats and action heroes. Basically, says Chudacoff, they spent most of their time doing what looked like nothing much at all.
>
> "They improvised play, whether it was in the outdoors? or whether it was on a street corner or somebody's back yard," Chudacoff says. "They improvised their own play; they regulated their play; they made up their own rules."
>
> But during the second half of the 20th century, Chudacoff argues, play changed radically. Instead of spending their time in autonomous shifting make-believe, children were supplied with ever more specific toys for play and predetermined scripts. Essentially, instead of playing pirate with a tree branch they played Star Wars with a toy light saber. Chudacoff calls this the commercialization and co-optation of child's play ? a trend which begins to shrink the size of children's imaginative space.
>
> But commercialization isn't the only reason imagination comes under siege. In the second half of the 20th century, Chudacoff says, parents became increasingly concerned about safety, and were driven to create play environments that were secure and could not be penetrated by threats of the outside world. Karate classes, gymnastics, summer camps ? these create safe environments for children, Chudacoff says. And they also do something more: for middle-class parents increasingly worried about achievement, they offer to enrich a child's mind.
> ______
>
> Despite the evidence of the benefits of imaginative play, however, even in the context of preschool young children's play is in decline. According to Yale psychological researcher Dorothy Singer, teachers and school administrators just don't see the value.
>
> "Because of the testing, and the emphasis now that you have to really pass these tests, teachers are starting earlier and earlier to drill the kids in their basic fundamentals. Play is viewed as unnecessary, a waste of time," Singer says. "I have so many articles that have documented the shortening of free play for children, where the teachers in these schools are using the time for cognitive skills."
>
> and concludes:
>
> It seems that in the rush to give children every advantage ? to protect them, to stimulate them, to enrich them ? our culture has unwittingly compromised one of the activities that helped children most. All that wasted time was not such a waste after all.
> _______________________________________________
> CCBC-Net mailing list
> CCBC-Net at ccbc.education.wisc.edu
> Visit this link to read archives or to unsubscribe...
> http://ccbc.education.wisc.edu/mailman/listinfo/ccbc-net
-- Deborah http://www.dkray.com mailto:dkray at dkray.comReceived on Fri 22 Feb 2008 08:12:29 PM CST
