CCBC-Net Archives
[CCBC-Net] Old Is New Again
- Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
From: Steward, Celeste <csteward>
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 14:03:43 -0800
Exactly...I've always been a big believer in "benign neglect" when my children were younger...and I truly believe that a heavy diet of electronics, structured activities, etc. are robbing today's children of the chance to live in their imaginations for a very short and precious time.
I don't know how adults manage to lose that priceless childlike capacity of wonder...perhaps it's the price you pay for growing up.
On "retro" books...I was unsuccessful at selling the Wednesday Wars to my 8th grade daughter...she yawned when she heard mention of Shakespeare. However, both my 6th and 8th grader were completely captivated by Gordon Korman's Schooled. While Korman's book embraced a similar time period, they found the updated book cover art and multi-voiced approach intriguing. Perhaps it's a question of packaging? No, couldn't be that simple....just my deep thoughts on a Friday afternoon.
Celeste Steward, Collection Development Librarian Alameda County Library 2450 Stevenson Blvd. Fremont, CA 94538
-----Original Message----- From: ccbc-net-bounces at ccbc.education.wisc.edu
[mailto:ccbc-net-bounces at ccbc.education.wisc.edu] On Behalf Of James Elliott Sent: Friday, February 22, 2008 1:41 PM To: Alison Hendon Cc: Subscribers of ccbc-net Subject: Re: [CCBC-Net] Old Is New Again
NPR had an article on the new 'Play' for children today. And I wonder how that relates to the 'retro' books coming on the market -- perhaps a nostalgic move towards a simpler time when play wasn't determined by how many controllers you had for your XBox 360?
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=19212514
Part of the article reads:
Chudacoff's recently published history of child's play argues that for most of human history what children did when they played was roam in packs large or small, more or less unsupervised, and engage in freewheeling imaginative play. They were pirates and princesses, aristocrats and action heroes. Basically, says Chudacoff, they spent most of their time doing what looked like nothing much at all.
"They improvised play, whether it was in the outdoors... or whether it was on a street corner or somebody's back yard," Chudacoff says. "They improvised their own play; they regulated their play; they made up their own rules."
But during the second half of the 20th century, Chudacoff argues, play changed radically. Instead of spending their time in autonomous shifting make-believe, children were supplied with ever more specific toys for play and predetermined scripts. Essentially, instead of playing pirate with a tree branch they played Star Wars with a toy light saber. Chudacoff calls this the commercialization and co-optation of child's play - a trend which begins to shrink the size of children's imaginative space.
But commercialization isn't the only reason imagination comes under siege. In the second half of the 20th century, Chudacoff says, parents became increasingly concerned about safety, and were driven to create play environments that were secure and could not be penetrated by threats of the outside world. Karate classes, gymnastics, summer camps - these create safe environments for children, Chudacoff says. And they also do something more: for middle-class parents increasingly worried about achievement, they offer to enrich a child's mind.
______
Despite the evidence of the benefits of imaginative play, however, even in the context of preschool young children's play is in decline. According to Yale psychological researcher Dorothy Singer, teachers and school administrators just don't see the value.
"Because of the testing, and the emphasis now that you have to really pass these tests, teachers are starting earlier and earlier to drill the kids in their basic fundamentals. Play is viewed as unnecessary, a waste of time," Singer says. "I have so many articles that have documented the shortening of free play for children, where the teachers in these schools are using the time for cognitive skills."
and concludes:
It seems that in the rush to give children every advantage - to protect them, to stimulate them, to enrich them - our culture has unwittingly compromised one of the activities that helped children most. All that wasted time was not such a waste after all.
_______________________________________________ CCBC-Net mailing list CCBC-Net at ccbc.education.wisc.edu Visit this link to read archives or to unsubscribe... http://ccbc.education.wisc.edu/mailman/listinfo/ccbc-net
Received on Fri 22 Feb 2008 04:03:43 PM CST
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 14:03:43 -0800
Exactly...I've always been a big believer in "benign neglect" when my children were younger...and I truly believe that a heavy diet of electronics, structured activities, etc. are robbing today's children of the chance to live in their imaginations for a very short and precious time.
I don't know how adults manage to lose that priceless childlike capacity of wonder...perhaps it's the price you pay for growing up.
On "retro" books...I was unsuccessful at selling the Wednesday Wars to my 8th grade daughter...she yawned when she heard mention of Shakespeare. However, both my 6th and 8th grader were completely captivated by Gordon Korman's Schooled. While Korman's book embraced a similar time period, they found the updated book cover art and multi-voiced approach intriguing. Perhaps it's a question of packaging? No, couldn't be that simple....just my deep thoughts on a Friday afternoon.
Celeste Steward, Collection Development Librarian Alameda County Library 2450 Stevenson Blvd. Fremont, CA 94538
-----Original Message----- From: ccbc-net-bounces at ccbc.education.wisc.edu
[mailto:ccbc-net-bounces at ccbc.education.wisc.edu] On Behalf Of James Elliott Sent: Friday, February 22, 2008 1:41 PM To: Alison Hendon Cc: Subscribers of ccbc-net Subject: Re: [CCBC-Net] Old Is New Again
NPR had an article on the new 'Play' for children today. And I wonder how that relates to the 'retro' books coming on the market -- perhaps a nostalgic move towards a simpler time when play wasn't determined by how many controllers you had for your XBox 360?
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=19212514
Part of the article reads:
Chudacoff's recently published history of child's play argues that for most of human history what children did when they played was roam in packs large or small, more or less unsupervised, and engage in freewheeling imaginative play. They were pirates and princesses, aristocrats and action heroes. Basically, says Chudacoff, they spent most of their time doing what looked like nothing much at all.
"They improvised play, whether it was in the outdoors... or whether it was on a street corner or somebody's back yard," Chudacoff says. "They improvised their own play; they regulated their play; they made up their own rules."
But during the second half of the 20th century, Chudacoff argues, play changed radically. Instead of spending their time in autonomous shifting make-believe, children were supplied with ever more specific toys for play and predetermined scripts. Essentially, instead of playing pirate with a tree branch they played Star Wars with a toy light saber. Chudacoff calls this the commercialization and co-optation of child's play - a trend which begins to shrink the size of children's imaginative space.
But commercialization isn't the only reason imagination comes under siege. In the second half of the 20th century, Chudacoff says, parents became increasingly concerned about safety, and were driven to create play environments that were secure and could not be penetrated by threats of the outside world. Karate classes, gymnastics, summer camps - these create safe environments for children, Chudacoff says. And they also do something more: for middle-class parents increasingly worried about achievement, they offer to enrich a child's mind.
______
Despite the evidence of the benefits of imaginative play, however, even in the context of preschool young children's play is in decline. According to Yale psychological researcher Dorothy Singer, teachers and school administrators just don't see the value.
"Because of the testing, and the emphasis now that you have to really pass these tests, teachers are starting earlier and earlier to drill the kids in their basic fundamentals. Play is viewed as unnecessary, a waste of time," Singer says. "I have so many articles that have documented the shortening of free play for children, where the teachers in these schools are using the time for cognitive skills."
and concludes:
It seems that in the rush to give children every advantage - to protect them, to stimulate them, to enrich them - our culture has unwittingly compromised one of the activities that helped children most. All that wasted time was not such a waste after all.
_______________________________________________ CCBC-Net mailing list CCBC-Net at ccbc.education.wisc.edu Visit this link to read archives or to unsubscribe... http://ccbc.education.wisc.edu/mailman/listinfo/ccbc-net
Received on Fri 22 Feb 2008 04:03:43 PM CST
