From: Patricia L. Jarrach, Esq. <trish>
Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 08:03:25 -0400

But, when Dumbledore died all of his spells protecting Hogwart's were also cancelled. Wouldn't he have wanted to keep those intact...if it was just a matter of intent?

Trish Jarrach

-----Original Message----- From: ccbc-net-bounces at ccbc.education.wisc.edu
[mailto:ccbc-net-bounces at ccbc.education.wisc.edu]On Behalf Of Kelley E.W. Milton Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2007 5:38 PM To: CCBC-Net at ccbc.ad.education.wisc.edu Subject: [CCBC-Net] HP7


On spells staying/releasing... there also may be something of intent there as well, if it wasn't Snape. Dumbledore 'petrified' Harry in a flash, since it was all he had, not planning on anything beyond a few minutes, whereas Moody knew that he had to protect the house no matter what, for a long time, and perhaps in setting the spell, part of the intent could have been that it would only break when Voldemort was gone or some such, and could have set it that it would go on regardless of him, knowing that as a member of the OOTP, he might die. Oof! Sorry about the run-on sentence! Kelley Milton



____________________________________________________________________________
________ Pinpoint customers who are looking for what you sell. http://searchmarketing.yahoo.com/
_______________________________________________ CCBC-Net mailing list CCBC-Net at ccbc.education.wisc.edu Visit this link to read archives or to unsubscribe... http://ccbc.education.wisc.edu/mailman/listinfo/ccbc-net No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.476 / Virus Database: 269.11.19/953 - Release Date: 8/14/2007 5:19 PM

No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.476 / Virus Database: 269.11.19/953 - Release Date: 8/14/2007 5:19 PM
Received on Thu 16 Aug 2007 07:03:25 AM CDT