CCBC-Net Archives
[CCBC-Net] HP7: horcruxes & backstory
- Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
From: Wendy Lanehart <WLanehart>
Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2007 11:15:10 -0400
I remember DD explaining to Harry that as Voldemort made each horcrux, his soul literally became more divided and unstable. To me, he DOES get weaker, because as he divides his soul more and more, he becomes increasingly disconnected with both his humanity and himself. The fact that he doesn't know when a horcrux has been destroyed underscores the fact that by making so many he has actually weakened himself and made himself vulnerable when he was trying to do the opposite. Also, he doesn't even realize he has made Harry a horcrux, which contributes to his downfall. Because no one has ever made more than one horcrux before, much less 7, I think it is kind of a murky area in the world of the book.
Thanks to whomever recommended the interview with Rowling on Mugglenet; it did answer a lot of questions left unanswered at the end of the book, such as what everyone does with their later lives. As much as I like knowing, part of me feels like it's "cheating," as none of this is actually in any of the books, it's just backstory from Rowling's head. Am I being picky? Can you think of another author who shared extensive info on their books that wasn't actually IN any of the books?
Wendy Lanehart Children's Librarian Central Rappahannock Regional Library Fredericksburg, Virginia
I enjoyed Harry Potter 7 (indeed, the whole series, but if anybody else
asks me, a writer, if I'm making as much money as Rowling, I shall hurl a Crucio spell at him or her). I was also confused about the wands until my husband explained them to me. :->
However, I'm still puzzled by the horcruxes. It seems to me that as each is destroyed that Voldemort, losing parts of his soul, would get weaker and weaker. My husband says, "It's magic. Deal with it." But it still bothers me. Was anyone else troubled by this? Is this a better explanation that
"it's magic"?
Marilyn Singer
_www.marilynsinger.net_ (http://www.marilynsinger.net)
*****
Received on Wed 08 Aug 2007 10:15:10 AM CDT
Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2007 11:15:10 -0400
I remember DD explaining to Harry that as Voldemort made each horcrux, his soul literally became more divided and unstable. To me, he DOES get weaker, because as he divides his soul more and more, he becomes increasingly disconnected with both his humanity and himself. The fact that he doesn't know when a horcrux has been destroyed underscores the fact that by making so many he has actually weakened himself and made himself vulnerable when he was trying to do the opposite. Also, he doesn't even realize he has made Harry a horcrux, which contributes to his downfall. Because no one has ever made more than one horcrux before, much less 7, I think it is kind of a murky area in the world of the book.
Thanks to whomever recommended the interview with Rowling on Mugglenet; it did answer a lot of questions left unanswered at the end of the book, such as what everyone does with their later lives. As much as I like knowing, part of me feels like it's "cheating," as none of this is actually in any of the books, it's just backstory from Rowling's head. Am I being picky? Can you think of another author who shared extensive info on their books that wasn't actually IN any of the books?
Wendy Lanehart Children's Librarian Central Rappahannock Regional Library Fredericksburg, Virginia
I enjoyed Harry Potter 7 (indeed, the whole series, but if anybody else
asks me, a writer, if I'm making as much money as Rowling, I shall hurl a Crucio spell at him or her). I was also confused about the wands until my husband explained them to me. :->
However, I'm still puzzled by the horcruxes. It seems to me that as each is destroyed that Voldemort, losing parts of his soul, would get weaker and weaker. My husband says, "It's magic. Deal with it." But it still bothers me. Was anyone else troubled by this? Is this a better explanation that
"it's magic"?
Marilyn Singer
_www.marilynsinger.net_ (http://www.marilynsinger.net)
*****
Received on Wed 08 Aug 2007 10:15:10 AM CDT
