From: Cindy Dobrez <dobrez>
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2001 21:04:22 -0500

I understand how a sequel like _Amber Spyglass_ would not stand alone (you'd be completely lost without the first two books.) _A Year Down Yonder_, though, doesn't really require the first book for enjoyment or understanding, although you wouldn't want to miss any possible encounter with Grandma Dowdle.

I BEG this year's committee to consider _True Believer_ by Wolfe as a sequel that is not dependent upon the first novel. Certainly your understanding of LaVaughn is enhanced by having "lived through" her experiences with Jolly and her children in _Make Lemonade_, but this book really focuses on LaVaughn and does not require that prior knowledge. I've shared the book with a few people who weren't familiar with the first title and they ached right along with LaVaughn as she suffers through infatuation, unrequited love, and changing friendships. I could scarcely breathe during much of my reading--fortunately I finished it in a gulp!

I agree with Steven that the Printz has many nice features that open the award to broader possibilities--just another example of the fine work that went into shaping this award. I think that Peter's clarification and the wording of the criteria allow for the interpretation of "self-contained" to include sequels as long as they are not overly dependent on their prequels or companion novels. As Harry matures into a teen, perhaps his seventh and final story might be worthy of and suitable for a Printz, perhaps not. Every year, though, the committee will seriously consider books that may become prequels to other books. The same consideration should be given to books that fall in the middle or the end of a series, and I trust the committees to do just that. I am a "true believer."

Cindy Dobrez, Librarian Harbor Lights Middle School 3600 N. 152nd Ave. Holland, MI 49424 616s8h84 dobrez at novagate.com
Received on Thu 22 Feb 2001 08:04:22 PM CST